0

Uncategorized

Court-appointed expert isn’t immune from suit 

  • by
    • April 15, 2013

A court-appointed was not immune from liability for allegedly failing to provide contracted-for services in a divorce case, the Oklahoma Supreme Court has ruled in reversing a dismissal.
The plaintiff was a party to a divorce in which child custody was disputed. The trial judge appointed the defendant to conduct » […]

Original post by http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/15/court-appointed-expert-isnt-immune-from-suit/

Report bad drivers!

Related posts:

  1. Psychiatrist isn’t immune in prison suicide  A private doctor who provided psychiatric services at a local prison could not claim qualified immunity when sued for failing...
  2. Justices to decide if government immune in sexual assault by prison guards  The U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether the federal government is immune from tort liability for the alleged sexual assault...
  3. Patient’s post-treatment conduct admissible  A medical malpractice defendant could introduce evidence to show that the plaintiff’s post-treatment conduct was the sole proximate cause of her...
  4. Medtronic bone graft suit isn’t preempted, says trial court  Federal law does not preempt a product liability suit brought by a woman who claimed she suffered injuries as a...
  5. Medical malpractice suit isn’t time-barred  The statute of limitations for a medical malpractice claim was not triggered when the patient merely suspected that she had...

Leave a comment