0

baddrivers

Generic Reglan claim isn’t preempted 

  • by
    • March 18, 2013

Federal law does not preempt a product liability suit against drug maker PLIVA based on the company’s alleged failure to update its warning label for the generic form of Reglan, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in reversing a dismissal.
Between 2004 and 2007, the plaintiff was » […]

Original post by http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/03/18/generic-reglan-claim-isnt-preempted/

Report bad drivers!

Related posts:

  1. Medtronic pain pump claim isn’t preempted  Federal law does not preempt a state failure-to-warn lawsuit brought by a man who claimed he suffered paralysis as the...
  2. Medtronic pacemaker claim preempted  Federal law preempts product liability claims relating to a woman who died when her Medtronic pacemaker failed, a U.S. District...
  3. Railroad crossing suit isn’t completely preempted  Federal transportation law does not completely preempt the state tort claims of a motorcyclist who suffered catastrophic injuries in a...
  4. Medtronic bone graft suit isn’t preempted, says trial court  Federal law does not preempt a product liability suit brought by a woman who claimed she suffered injuries as a...
  5. Medical malpractice suit isn’t time-barred  The statute of limitations for a medical malpractice claim was not triggered when the patient merely suspected that she had...

Leave a comment