0

baddrivers

Fosamax suit can’t proceed based on ‘sham’ issue 

  • by
    • February 4, 2013

Irreconcilable contradictions in expert testimony prevented a product liability plaintiff from establishing that Merck failed to provide adequate warnings with the osteoporosis drug Fosamax, the 2nd Circuit has ruled in affirming judgment.
The plaintiff developed osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in 2004 and 2005. She filed a failure-to-warn product liability » […]

Original post by http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/04/fosamax-suit-cant-proceed-based-on-sham-issue/

Report bad drivers!

Related posts:

  1. Fosamax litigation ready for next step  Six years after the first Fosamax lawsuit was filed, litigation over the osteoporosis drug is about to start a new...
  2. Fosamax litigation ready for next step in bellwether cases  Six years after the first Fosamax lawsuit was filed, litigation over the osteoporosis drug is about to start a new...
  3. Asbestos plaintiff can show causation  A product liability plaintiff produced sufficient evidence linking her husband’s mesothelioma to particular asbestos products to proceed with her claims...
  4. Asbestos plaintiff can show causation, State Supremes say  A product liability plaintiff produced sufficient evidence linking her husband’s mesothelioma to particular asbestos products to proceed with her claims...
  5. Evidence of prior Ford Windstar fires inadmissible  A product liability plaintiff could not introduce evidence of previous electrical fires in Ford Windstar vans to show that the...

Leave a comment