0

baddrivers

Railroad crossing suit isn’t completely preempted 

  • by
    • January 28, 2013

Federal transportation law does not completely preempt the state tort claims of a motorcyclist who suffered catastrophic injuries in a collision with a train at a railroad crossing, the 3rd Circuit has ruled.
The plaintiff suffered injuries that left him partially paralyzed in an accident that occurred at night at » […]

Original post by http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/28/railroad-crossing-suit-isnt-completely-preempted/

Report bad drivers!

Related posts:

  1. Medtronic bone graft suit isn’t preempted, says trial court  Federal law does not preempt a product liability suit brought by a woman who claimed she suffered injuries as a...
  2. Medtronic bone graft suit isn’t preempted  Federal law does not preempt a product liability suit brought by a woman who claimed she suffered injuries as a...
  3. Medtronic pain pump claim isn’t preempted  Federal law does not preempt a state failure-to-warn lawsuit brought by a man who claimed he suffered paralysis as the...
  4. Railroad had no duty to protect trespassing youth  A railroad had no duty to prevent injuries suffered by a boy who attempted to jump a slow-moving freight train,...
  5. State-law Raptiva suits preempted  Federal law preempted Michigan product liability actions that alleged injuries from the psoriasis drug Raptiva, the 6th Circuit has ruled...

Leave a comment