0

baddrivers

Amusement park customer assumed risk of injury 

  • by
    • January 8, 2013

An amusement park customer assumed the risk of injury from head-on collisions in the course of a bumper car ride, the California Supreme Court has ruled in reversing judgment.
The plaintiff broke her wrist when she accompanied her 10-year-old son on a bumper car ride at the defendant’s amusement park. » […]

Original post by http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/08/amusement-park-customer-assumed-risk-of-injury/

Report bad drivers!

Related posts:

  1. Benchmarks: Amusement park isn’t liable for bumper car injury  The California Supreme Court restored a measure of sanity to state premises liability law on Monday, ruling that an amusement...
  2. Amusement ride injury results in $9.9 million settlement  A South Carolina lawyer has negotiated a $9.9 million settlement for a client who was injured on an amusement ride...
  3. Benchmarks: Rollerblader didn’t assume risk of injury  If you tool around the neighborhood with wheels on your feet, you should accept the simple fact that you’ve appreciably...
  4. Minimizing Your Risk Of A Car Accident Car accidents happen.  A lot.  In Arizona, for example, there were over 100,000 car accidents reported in 2011 alone.  With...
  5. Injury accident reported near Mitchell Park in San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo County, California – September 26, 2012 Police responded Wednesday to an accident with injury in San Luis Obispo. Officers...

Leave a comment