0

baddrivers

‘Open and obvious’ rule doesn’t bar shopper’s suit 

  • by
    • January 4, 2013

A store could be liable for failing to protect a customer from tripping over an “open and obvious” hazard, the Nevada Supreme Court has ruled in reversing a summary judgment.
The plaintiff sued Costco for negligence for injuries sustained when he tripped and fell over a wooden pallet that an » […]

Original post by http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/04/open-and-obvious-rule-doesnt-bar-shoppers-suit/

Report bad drivers!

Related posts:

  1. Dad’s release doesn’t bar suit over play center injuries  BJ’s Wholesale Club could not enforce a release signed by a father before his child sustained serious brain damage in...
  2. Federal law doesn’t preempt suit against gun maker  Federal law does not preempt the lawsuit of a gang shooting victim who alleged a gun manufacturer negligently allowed its...
  3. Benchmarks: HIPAA doesn’t preempt wrongful disclosure suit  A West Virginia man can sue for the wrongful disclosure of his mental health records to his estranged wife and...
  4. Jury awards local bar customer $2 million  A bar in Honolulu, Hawaii has lost a multimillion dollar civil suit after a patron slipped and fell on some...
  5. Real estate agent gets $155,000 in trip-and-fall suit  A Baltimore judge has ordered U.S. Bank N.A. to pay a real estate agent $155,566 for injuries she received during...

Leave a comment