0

baddrivers

Benchmarks: Amusement park isn’t liable for bumper car injury 

  • by
    • January 2, 2013

The California Supreme Court restored a measure of sanity to state premises liability law on Monday, ruling that an amusement park had no liability for a fractured wrist suffered by a customer on a bumper car ride.
“We conclude the primary assumption of risk doctrine, though most frequently applied to » […]

Original post by http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/02/benchmarks-amusement-park-isnt-liable-for-bumper-car-injury/

Report bad drivers!

Related posts:

  1. Amusement ride injury results in $9.9 million settlement  A South Carolina lawyer has negotiated a $9.9 million settlement for a client who was injured on an amusement ride...
  2. Benchmarks: Rollerblader didn’t assume risk of injury  If you tool around the neighborhood with wheels on your feet, you should accept the simple fact that you’ve appreciably...
  3. Store isn’t liable for drunk driving death  A store could not be subject to dram shop liability based on its selling beer to the underage passenger of...
  4. Crocs isn’t liable for child’s escalator injuries  Crocs did not have a duty to warn that its resin sandals posed a risk to young children riding escalators,...
  5. Park department can’t be liable for snow in parking lot  An unnatural accumulation of snow and ice constitutes the “existence of a condition of any public property” and therefore the...

Leave a comment