0

Uncategorized

Stryker not strictly liable for design defect 

  • by
    • December 4, 2012

Medical device makers could not be held strictly liable for an alleged design defect in a surgically implanted prosthetic device, the California Court of Appeal has ruled in affirming a summary judgment.
The plaintiff was diagnosed with cancer in his left thigh bone. A surgeon replaced the middle portion of » […]

Original post by http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/04/stryker-not-strictly-liable-for-design-defect/

Report bad drivers!

Related posts:

  1. Justices to rule on preemption of drug design defect claims  The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether federal law preempts state law design defect claims targeting generic pharmaceutical...
  2. Medtronic bone graft suit isn’t preempted  Federal law does not preempt a product liability suit brought by a woman who claimed she suffered injuries as a...
  3. Medtronic bone graft suit isn’t preempted, says trial court  Federal law does not preempt a product liability suit brought by a woman who claimed she suffered injuries as a...
  4. Cruise line may be liable for gang-related shooting  A cruise line may be liable for failing to warn passengers of the danger of gang violence at a port...
  5. Park department can’t be liable for snow in parking lot  An unnatural accumulation of snow and ice constitutes the “existence of a condition of any public property” and therefore the...

Leave a comment