0

baddrivers

Mesothelioma duty-to-warn case splits states 

  • by
    • November 30, 2012

Mass tort litigators are abuzz over a recent Washington state court ruling that some say expands manufacturers’ duty to warn about potential hazards associated with their products, even when those hazards are not caused by the products themselves.
The decision in Macias v. Saberhagen Holdings, 198 P.3d 493 (Wash. » Continue […]

Original post by http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/30/mesothelioma-duty-to-warn-case-splits-states/

Report bad drivers!

Related posts:

  1. Benchmarks: Court limits duty of left-turning drivers  As young drivers, we are taught to keep our wheels straight when waiting to make a left-hand turn. That’s to...
  2. Contractor had no duty to preserve evidence  A general contractor did not have a duty to preserve a concrete I-beam that was involved in an accident resulting...
  3. Railroad had no duty to protect trespassing youth  A railroad had no duty to prevent injuries suffered by a boy who attempted to jump a slow-moving freight train,...
  4. Benchmarks: Auto insurer had no duty to protect lawyer’s fee  An Indiana lawyer thought he had a case against State Farm when he failed to receive his fair share of...
  5. Defense scores verdict in bystander mesothelioma case  Rejecting a novel legal theory, a California jury found for defendants Exxon and Ford in a suit brought by a...

Leave a comment