0

baddrivers

Limited car use is ‘regular use’ under policy exclusion 

  • by
    • October 30, 2012

Driving a car solely for the purpose of going work constitutes “regular use” under an insurance policy exclusion that bars underinsurance motorist coverage, a Pennsylvania appellate court ruled.
The plaintiff was involved in a car accident caused by a drunk driver. Though the plaintiff lived with his mother, he was » […]

Original post by http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/30/limited-car-use-is-regular-use-under-policy-exclusion/

Report bad drivers!

Related posts:

  1. Benchmarks: Home insurer botches jet ski exclusion  An insurance company thought that by excluding coverage for “jet skis” it wouldn’t have to worry about paying injury claims...
  2. Driver hurt when car drives off embankment by I-580 in Livermore Alameda County, California — October 15, 2012 Authorities believe a single-vehicle crash that occurred Monday morning in Livermore and injured...
  3. Driver injured in crash with Sacramento cop car at Elvas and 64th Sacramento County, California — October 11, 2012 A motorists was hospitalized after rear-ending a police car Thursday morning at a...
  4. Divorce did not automatically revoke insurance benefit  A life insurance policy taken out during a marriage that named the spouse as beneficiary is not automatically revoked upon...
  5. Nursing home’s arbitration clause unenforceable  A nursing home sued for wrongful death could not enforce an “optional” arbitration agreement signed by the patient’s daughter upon...

Leave a comment