0

baddrivers

Contractor had no duty to preserve evidence 

  • by
    • October 23, 2012

A general contractor did not have a duty to preserve a concrete I-beam that was involved in an accident resulting in injuries to several employees, the Illinois Supreme Court has ruled.
While working on the reconstruction of a bridge, several workers were injured when the I-beam they were standing on » […]

Original post by http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/23/contractor-had-no-duty-to-preserve-evidence/

Report bad drivers!

Related posts:

  1. Railroad had no duty to protect trespassing youth  A railroad had no duty to prevent injuries suffered by a boy who attempted to jump a slow-moving freight train,...
  2. Insurer doesn’t owe duty of good faith to foster child  An insurance company that provided foster care liability insurance did not owe a duty of good faith to a foster...
  3. Richard Marshall, off-duty firefighter, seriously injured Novato crash Marin County, California — September 18, 2012 An off-duty Ross Valley fire captain was arrested on suspicion of driving while...
  4. Employee killed by falling beam on I-405 in West Los Angeles Los Angeles County, California – October 11, 2012 Police say an employee died Monday after being hit by a falling...
  5. Infant dies as SUV flips at I-40 and Essex near Mojave preserve San Bernardino County, California — September 24, 2012 Police say a child passenger died Monday when a sport-utility vehicle flipped...

Leave a comment