0

baddrivers

Medical malpractice suit isn’t time-barred 

  • by
    • October 9, 2012

The statute of limitations for a medical malpractice claim was not triggered when the patient merely suspected that she had received negligent medical treatment, the Utah Supreme Court has ruled in reversing a dismissal.
The defendant treated the plaintiff for a perforated colon that allegedly occurred as the result of » […]

Original post by http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/09/medical-malpractice-suit-isnt-time-barred/

Report bad drivers!

Related posts:

  1. Medtronic bone graft suit isn’t preempted, says trial court  Federal law does not preempt a product liability suit brought by a woman who claimed she suffered injuries as a...
  2. Jury awards $6 million in suit against hospital  A York County, Penn. jury has awarded $6 million to estate and family of a deceased Seven Valleys woman in...
  3. Medtronic bone graft suit isn’t preempted  Federal law does not preempt a product liability suit brought by a woman who claimed she suffered injuries as a...
  4. Medical episode suspected in crash on Citrus in Covina that injures two Los Angeles County, California – October 4, 2012 Police believe a medical condition contributed to a collision Thursday in the...
  5. Real estate is riskiest practice area, ABA survey finds  Legal malpractice insurers for the first time are reporting a higher percentage of claims involving real estate than any other...

Leave a comment